0 views
SWEET + DEVIL = PERFECT COMBINATION!!! , ♥ LET’S PLAY AND HAVE FUN ♥ AT GOAL SLOOPY BLOWJOB WITH NO HANDS♥ PVT ON 30TKS ♥ SNAPCHAT 4LIFE 25TKS ♥ SUSCRIBE MY FANSODA FOR $4.99♥ CONTROL LUSH 69 TKS♥ [Multi Goal]
Date: October 9, 2022
I had this in an MSc group project.
I was the editor and was assembling the different sections and 1 member had lifted her text from someone else’s published PhD paper (she lifted a big section about ray-tracing that had little to do with our topic) and topped it off with the Wikipedia entry on WiFi versions.
My choices: I could reject it and tell her to do it again, I could report her, I could do it myself. I thought that there’s no time to get her to redo it since it had taken her two weeks to not do it and we were 48 hours from submission. If I reported her it could affect the rest of us negatively. I didn’t have time to do her section properly as well as finish mine and edit the paper for the group.
In the end I chose to heavily edit her section so that it sounded like something someone would write normally (the original used the construct ‘computationally cumbersome’ which is what flagged up the plagiarism in the first place).
We passed the project but I’d never work with her again.
Shit, if OP can't praise his friends because of his gf's insecurities, he's fucked.